The Conclusions and Recommendations may be combined or, in long reports, presented in separate sections.

The Conclusions and Recommendations may be combined or, in long reports, presented in separate sections.

Conclusions and recommendations

If there are not any recommendations to be produced because of the project, just call this section Conclusions.

The Conclusions section sums up the key points of your discussion, the essential features of your design, or the significant outcomes of your investigation. As the function is to round the story off of assembling your project, it must:

  • be written to relate straight to the aims regarding the project as mentioned into the Introduction
  • indicate the extent to that your aims have been achieved
  • summarise the findings that are key outcomes or information in your report
  • acknowledge limitations and make suggestions for future work (where applicable)
  • highlight the significance or usefulness of the work.

The conclusions should relate to the aims of this work:

The aim of this project is always to design a mobile phone tower for a suburban location..

The mobile phone tower presented here can be erected safely in a suburban street.

It requires a complete part of a maximum of 2m 2 l, and contains the safety that is following.

This investigation will review the volume of passengers using the Monash University Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus in order to recommend adjustments towards the service if needed.

Analysis associated with the survey data obtained in this project shows that use of the Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus has grown by 24% in the past 5 years. It is strongly recommended that frequency be increased during peak usage.

The Conclusions section below is from a level 2 Civil Engineering Alternative Designs report presenting two designs for a an overpass bridge. Click on the buttons that are coloured start to see the comments.

Conclusions

All the two bridge designs Lecturer’s comment:
An elegant beginning for a Conclusions follows on neatly from the preceding discussion. In this full case, it indicates that the aims associated with project have been met. presented in this report fulfil the criteria specified when you look at the project brief. Both designs Lecturer’s comment:
The main findings or outcomes – in this case the key features of the designs – are then recapped. incorporate round piers on piled foundations, which are used considering that the soil conditions are unknown and perchance unstable. Design 1, an easy composite I-girder bridge, gets the advantageous asset of being made of steel and thus has longer spans and fewer piers.

Design 2, a beam that is super-T >Design 2 Lecturer’s comment:
The significance of the outcome – in this instance the final recommendation – is clearly stated. is therefore recommended. It includes Lecturer’s comment:
To finish off, the achievement regarding the project is reinforced. an inexpensive overpass with superior durability, and fully meets the requirements regarding the design brief.

Always address limitations and suggest how they might be overcome in future work. The below that is excerpt from the Conclusions of a study on a project investigating the result of pulsation on heat transfer in horizontal pipe flow.

Experimental results Lecturer’s comment:
Key conclusions drawn from the project. indicated that pulsed flow without flow reversal had no significant effect compared with steady flow. Preliminary experiments with reversed flow, however, clearly indicated increased heat transfer. This can be likely due Lecturer’s comment:
Provide a explanation that is possible notable essay writer results, especially unexpected ones. towards the large disturbances when you look at the boundary that is hydrodynamic when the flow changes direction. Further research Lecturer’s comment:
Recommend further research to address any extra work you think will be useful. is preferred to determine the maximum enhancement that is achievable.

It should be noted that Lecturer’s comment:
Acknowledge limitations or errors and suggest explanations and/or solutions. the experimental results try not to concur with the theoretical equations. This may be as a result of the deposits which developed within the pipe, or even to thermocouple temperature that is inconsistent. Therefore, regular inspection regarding the test rig is recommended.

For a really long report, it is acceptable to provide the conclusions and recommendations in point form:

The prototype robot courier presented here has been shown to be capable of delivering documents autonomously in an working office environment. It has demonstrated the next components of mobile robotics:

  1. Localisation: The Kalman localisation that is filter-based achieved sub-centimeter accuracy under normal operating conditions.
  2. Environment modelling: The occupancy map was updated dynamically to incorporate obstacles not contained in the original map.
  3. Path planning: A distance path that is transform-based using obstacle transforms produced a globally optimal local entrapment-free road to the target.